A UMass research on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is said to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is definitely an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two large resort gambling enterprises in the next few years.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.
The study, which comes from the class of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That is enough to produce it the biggest gambling research ever completed in the usa.
Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies
The study ended up being praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who stated that it should provide a way that is objective understand the way the state will be impacted by gambling going forward.
‘The most important point is that we are establishing standard conditions for every socio and economic variable that might be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our researchers will then track changes in those variables throughout the life time of the gambling enterprises in order to know up to a certainty the consequences and also to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for any potential negative consequences.’
The study was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.
The outcome was a wide range of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.
As an example, it turns out that about 72 % of respondents reported gambling at least one time on the year that is past.
Most Massachusetts residents (about 60 percent) stated they played the lottery, while 22 % reported that they had gone to a casino during the year that is past.
Residents Like Casinos, Although Not Locally
One hot topic in the region was how Massachusetts’ new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are directly to worry: 65 percent of these Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a percentage that should go way down if the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked into just how residents feel about the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor or more to three casinos that are full-scale. The answer was the one that has been heard in many communities through the continuing state: not in my own backyard.
A strong 59 % majority of adults in Massachusetts said they think gambling expansion will either have a neutral impact or be good for the state.
Nevertheless, 46 percent think that gambling expansion is harmful inside their community that is own just 28 percent believe casino expansion would be useful locally.
The study also discovered that illegal gambling was fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports into the year that is past while two % reporting gambling on unregulated Internet gaming web sites.
More analysis that is in-depth of data collected is expected to be released within the months to come. However, principal detective Rachel Volberg claims that the real value in this survey ended up being collecting information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize just how uncommon it really is for a problem survey that is gambling be completed before some new type of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission so clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I am excited to share our findings before any gambling enterprises begin operations in our state.’
Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) after which Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA does not share might values for the law enforcement community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, paid to it by FIFA, to fund a joint anti-match-fixing program.
The 10-year Integrity in Sport initiative was designed to stamp down fixed games orchestrated by criminal wagering syndicates, but Interpol said this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the current context surrounding FIFA, while Interpol continues to be committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, i’ve decided to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All outside lovers, whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and axioms of the organization, aswell as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions of this deal, signed last year, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible with the principles, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, after the arrest of seven FIFA officials due to the fact result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not kept up its end of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why had been Interpol, featuring its wide-reaching access to an expansive network of police agencies, unaware of FIFA corruption in 2011?
The press that is british crying foul as far back as 2006. This was the year that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul! The World that is secret of: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The name claims it all.
Also in 2006, Panorama, a BBC affairs that are current, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter was being investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.
Inside it, Lord Triesman, the former president of the English Football Association, described FIFA being an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’,
A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he didn’t.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its mind in the sand might have been more about the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the international law enforcement agency constituted more than one fourth of its annual budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the united states, the nation that is only dared to support the organization to task, it was too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
For a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and think us, it’s a zinger!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a vehicle,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But who’s driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The police,’ he zinged.
Fleetingly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had selected to ‘relinquish his office.’
Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million check that is dud when Ritz staff tried to cash it the day after his gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
Based on the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury wrote out the check to fund a gambling session one night in February last 12 months, but it turned into a dud whenever casino tried to bank it the following morning.
The Ritz can be looking for an£ that is extra ($310,000) in accumulated interest on the debt.
It has been reported that the casino, that is owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a number of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively in the courts.
Based on the London Evening Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the last year alone in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s protection is which he is a gambling addict and their staff should have understood this and stopped him from playing.
He desires the debts written off, but he is on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won an identical tall Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the spouse of the Omani minister that is foreign.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had visited the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a hours that are few. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million planet 7 oz codes 2018 ($1.65) of her debt. She immediately counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantage of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a casino game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made conscious of her gambling addiction, and also allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was illegal.
She also said that the casino have been under a ‘duty of care’ towards her, a responsibility which it had neglected to fulfill.
However, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a months that are few her see to your Ritz.
The judge said he had been certain that, had Al-Daher been refused permission to carry on gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would have been eager and inclined to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very probably during her stay in London during the times or weeks after 3 April 2012. in governing in favor regarding the casino’
The judge in the Al Geabury instance, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a hearing that is preliminary psychiatric reports were commissioned to assess Al Geabury’s state of head on the day he destroyed the money and whether he was in charge of his actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury includes a gambling addiction while the claimant’s familiarity with that,’ she said.